<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malaysian Equity: More Bull</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dirtyresearch.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/malaysian-equity-more-bull/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dirtyresearch.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/malaysian-equity-more-bull/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 05:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trading: More Bull&#8230; at TRADINGMALAYSIA.COM</title>
		<link>http://dirtyresearch.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/malaysian-equity-more-bull/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator>Trading: More Bull&#8230; at TRADINGMALAYSIA.COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirtyresearch.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/malaysian-equity-more-bull/#comment-4498</guid>
		<description>[...] Each core portfolio should consist of companies in a few industries which the holder believes reflects the strength of the country in terms of 1) its economic advantage over competitors and 2) its development stage (i.e. fragmented industries operating in a growing market where barriers to entry are relatively high). In terms of 1, I believe that Malaysia can offer plantantion and contruction. In terms of 2, it is definitely telecommunications, utilities, finance and property (although some may argue many more than that). That is why most analysts like Public Bank, KLCC, Tanjong, Tenaga etc. See this report. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Each core portfolio should consist of companies in a few industries which the holder believes reflects the strength of the country in terms of 1) its economic advantage over competitors and 2) its development stage (i.e. fragmented industries operating in a growing market where barriers to entry are relatively high). In terms of 1, I believe that Malaysia can offer plantantion and contruction. In terms of 2, it is definitely telecommunications, utilities, finance and property (although some may argue many more than that). That is why most analysts like Public Bank, KLCC, Tanjong, Tenaga etc. See this report. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trading: More Bull&#8230; &#171; Dirty Dog&#8217;s Trading and Music Blog</title>
		<link>http://dirtyresearch.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/malaysian-equity-more-bull/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Trading: More Bull&#8230; &#171; Dirty Dog&#8217;s Trading and Music Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirtyresearch.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/malaysian-equity-more-bull/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>[...] Each core portfolio should consist of companies in a few industries which the holder believes reflects the strength of the country in terms of 1) its economic advantage over competitors and 2) its development stage  (i.e. fragmented industries operating in a growing market where barriers to entry are relatively high). In terms of 1, I believe that Malaysia can offer plantantion and contruction. In terms of 2, it is definitely telecommunications, utilities, finance and property (although some may argue many more than that). That is why most analysts like Public Bank, KLCC, Tanjong, Tenaga etc.  See this report. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Each core portfolio should consist of companies in a few industries which the holder believes reflects the strength of the country in terms of 1) its economic advantage over competitors and 2) its development stage  (i.e. fragmented industries operating in a growing market where barriers to entry are relatively high). In terms of 1, I believe that Malaysia can offer plantantion and contruction. In terms of 2, it is definitely telecommunications, utilities, finance and property (although some may argue many more than that). That is why most analysts like Public Bank, KLCC, Tanjong, Tenaga etc.  See this report. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
